| |

INDEX

PRESENTATION
Eduard
Rius i Pey, Ministry of Health
Our health system,
like that of the majority of countries in our area, finds itself confronted
with the challenge of being able to meet increasing demands and needs
of the population with limited resources and at the same time, offer efficient,
high quality health services that contribute to improving the health of
all citizens.
In order to face
up to this situation we must base ourselves on adequate organisation
of the health system, as well as on powerful instruments for planning
and managing the services provided, while always bearing in mind that
the overall efficiency of the system is largely dependent on the contributions
made by each professional, who is, after all, in the best position to
be able to improve this effectiveness.
Whether it be professionals
at the moment of making clinical decisions, or health care service planners
and managers, adequate information is the one absolute necessity they
all have in common.
Health care information
is one of the basic elements for making the majority of decisions in
the system. This includes social, economic and demographic information
as well as data on the resources used in the health system, even including
information on the activity and morbidity associated with the health
care network.
In the area of
hospital care this information is available in the register of the Minimum
Basic Data Set for Hospital Discharges (CMBDAH) which is the basis for
analysing the suitability and quality of the services provided, accessibility,
variations in clinical practice, the complexity index for each centre
and the costs per disease.
Making all this
information available has required considerable effort on a technical,
human and economic scale by the hospital centres themselves as well
as the health care administration. But there is no doubt that the
usefulness of this tool means that its potential benefits more than
compensate for the effort required. We now have an instrument, the
CMBDAH register, which with utmost respect for regulations regarding
confidentiality and use, is available to any managers, health care
professionals and research workers who wish to consult it.
The Health Care
Department and the Catalan Health Service are firmly committed to
promoting this use as a way of advancing towards the goals that have
been established and of improving and maintaining the quality of this
information.
I
am pleased to present this dossier with the information from the CMBDAH
for the period 1996-1999. I would like to thank all those that have
made it possible for their co-operation, and hope that it proves to
be extremely useful.

INTRODUCTION
The systematic
register of morbidity and of the activity of hospital centers is an
instrument of great importance for hospitals and health-care authorities,
in that it makes it possible to obtain information on the pathology
treated, the characteristics of the treatment provided and its evolution
over time. Consequently, these data are vital for the management of
centers, for planning and evaluation and for defining the purchase of
services.
In accordance with
the order of November 23, 1990, "All public and private health-care
centers and establishments located in Catalonia are obliged to draw
up the minimum basic data set for hospital discharges (CMBDAH) for all
those patients whose treatment has produced at least one overnight stay.
Such data are to be sent regularly to the Department of Health and Social
Security."
Since the transfer
of the management of the CMBDAH Register to the Catalan Health Service
(SCS) in 1993, the efforts made by both the hospitals and the Administration
have brought about an improvement in the quality of the data and also
made them more accessible.
With the aim of
making this information available to the whole health-care system, the
publication of "health-care activity reports" began in 1994. It was
within this editorial framework that the CMBDAH series got underway
with Discharges from acute-care hospitals in Catalonia, 1993.
In recent years,
two key developments
have taken place. On
the one hand, there has been a change in the health-care approach, in
the sense that certain procedures traditionally involving standard hospital
stays have gradually been included in the ambulatory system. On the
other hand, a new payment system has gone into effect (Decree 197/1997,
of July 22), which determines the contracting of health-care services
within the scope of the Catalan Health Service.
The growing need
for information regarding not only health-care processes now being
carried out within the ambulatory system but also those involving
sub-acute patients in specialized psychiatric hospitals has prompted
the systematic compiling of such data by the CMBDAH.
For this reason,
the modification of the 1996 Instruction Manual for Reporting to the
CMBDAH Register issues the following criteria:
"The CMBDAH must
be notified of all hospital discharges of acute patients, including
those involving major ambulatory surgery and day hospitals, all centers,
whether public or private, located in Catalonia."
The implantation
of the new payment system in the centers belonging to the Hospital
Network for Public Use (XHUP) has contributed to more comprehensive,
better-quality information. This is because part of the payment for
the health-care process takes into account the complexity of the pathology
treated, which is determined on the basis of the information provided
to the CMBDAH. It should be made clear, however, that this is not
analyzed in this report.
The information
provided by the CMBDAH
Register is at the disposal of managers, health-care professionals
and researchers who may need it, with the utmost respect for confidentiality
and proper use at all times. Both the Department and the Service wish
to encourage such use in the belief that this is the best way of achieving
the objectives they have established and of improving and maintaining
the quality of the Register.
CMBDAH as a hospital
management tool for the systematic compiling of information on the morbidity
dealt with in these centers. Here we resume the publication of "Health-care
activity reports" with the document Discharges from acute-care hospitals
in Catalonia 1996-1999. Our intention is to continue making the information
provided to the CMBDAH available to the entire health-care system.
Population-based
registers make it possible to analyze the differences in the patterns
of use of health-care services according to place of residence. In order
to carry out this analysis, it is necessary to have good coverage of
these registers and to bear in mind the limitations resulting from the
lack of comprehensive data for certain pathologies or age groups (such
as deliveries in private hospitals, for example). We can now assure
our readers and colleagues that the CMBDAH Register has attained a sufficient
level of coverage to begin population-based analyses that will be most
useful for the planning and evaluation of objectives involving health
care and service.
This
edition includes a breakdown of hospitalization activity by health-care
region and health-care sector. Nonetheless, research into the factors
conditioning the use of hospitalization resources at the territorial level
demands an in-depth analysis on the basis of this information and other
information beyond the scope of the CMBDAH.

THE
CMBDAH REGISTER
Objectives
and general characteristics
The fundamental
objective of the CMBDAH Register is to create a comprehensive and
valid data base on morbidity and hospital activity which can be used
to understand the pathologies dealt with in the centers, for health-care
planning, for the evaluation of resources and for the purchase of
services.
This
is a population-based register, which compiles information on the health-care
activity of acute-care hospitals and specialized psychiatric hospitals
in Catalonia. The information gathered from acute-care hospitals corresponds
to conventional hospitalization activity, ambulatory surgical procedures
(CMA) and day hospital episodes (HdD).

Description of the variables
The Register
presents the data provided by the CMBDAH, which have been coded according
to pre-established criteria in order to make them compatible and comparable
with other information systems.
These
data correspond to the following variables:
Discharge
identification variables:
Hospital
Medical record number
Case number
Sociodemographic
variables:
Date of birth
Sex
Place of residence
Administrative
variables:
Source of payment
Date of admission
Admission status
Date of discharge
Discharge status
Transfer hospital
Clinical
variables:
Diagnoses
(main diagnosis and up to 3 further diagnoses)
Procedures (up to 4 procedures)
Code E (external causes)
Perinatal
variables:
Length of pregnancy
Weight and sex of first newborn
Weight and sex of second newborn
The criteria
employed in the codification of the sociodemographic, administrative
and perinatal variables have been based on the Instruction Manual
for Reporting to the CMBDAH Register for 1996. For the clinical
variables, the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision,
Clinical Modification (ICD·9·CM) has been used.
During the
1996-1999 period, the ICD has been updated twice. Basically, these
modifications have been made to give greater specificity to the
codes and do not affect the results of the analysis for the year
in which this report is presented, since the data are analyzed by
code grouping.
In
1996, the Catalan Health Service (SCS) drew up its Regulations for
coding the clinical variables of the CMBDAH in order to unify the
coding criteria of health-care episodes. These Regulations, updated
in 1999, follow the criteria established by the state reference group
of the Spanish Ministry of Health and Consumption and have been drawn
up jointly with the coding
group of the Catalan Medical Documentation Society.

Organization and
operation
Every three
months, the hospitals send the data pertaining to their activity
to the CMBDAH Register either on diskette or by email.
Once received,
the data are validated in accordance with the criteria presented
in the section on quality control, and each hospital is sent the
summary of the validation. At the end of the year, the hospital
receives a report on its activity, and how it compares with other
hospitals of similar characteristics.
The data
on conventional hospitalization and CMA are sent annually to the
Ministry of Health and Consumption so that they can be included
in the national CMBDAH Register.
The CMBDAH
is also a source of information for external users and must reply
to requests received from other fields. In all cases, data can
only be released in accordance with current regulations regarding
confidentiality and use of information.
Since the
inclusion of the activity of major ambulatory surgery (CMA), day
hospital (HdD) and specialized psychiatric hospitals in the CMBDAH,
the activity reported to the CMBDAH has been classified into the
following types:
Conventional
hospitalization
Major ambulatory surgery
Day hospital
Psychiatric sub-acute care

During
1999, the CMBDAH Register received data from 79 acute-care hospitals
(63 of which belong to the Hospital Network for Public Use (XHUP)
and 16 of which do not) and 11 specialized psychiatric hospitals
(ANNEX
1).
During
the 1996-1999 period, the number of hospitals reporting to the
CMBDAH has varied, with respect both to those who belong to
the XHUP and those who do not (TABLE
1).
TABLE
1
Evolution
in number and types of hospitals reporting to the CMBDAH, by year.
1996-1999 period
The difference
in the number of XHUP hospitals between 1996 and 1997 (five
fewer) is due to the fact that two centers belonging to the
XHUP ceased acute-care activity and became social health-care
centers; and three dropped their affiliation with the XHUP,
even though they continued to provide acute care. On the other
hand, a new center joined the CMBDAH, which did not belong
to the XHUP.
In 1999,
yet another new center joined that did not belong to the XHUP.
The information
contained in the Register represents 100% of the discharges
from the XHUP and one third of the activity of hospitals not
belonging to the XHUP.
During
the 1996-1999 period, the total activity reported to the CMBDAH
has risen 22.8% (TABLE
2).
This increase has taken place in all categories, but mainly
in the activity corresponding to CMA (a rise of 246.9%) and
HdD (a rise of 350.3%). Such spectacular growth
is explained, on the one hand, by the increase of exhaustive
information provided by the Register and, on the other, by a
genuine increase in activity. Conventional hospitalization has
undergone more moderate growth (an increase of 5.4%) while psychiatric
sub-acute care has gone up 9.0%. With regard to the latter,
it should be pointed out that the data corresponding to 1999
are not comprehensive owing to the lack of information provided
by one specialized psychiatric hospital.
These
changes, both qualitative and quantitative, in the Register's
coverage should be kept in mind when comparing information
from different years.
TABLE
2
Number
of discharges by activity type and year. 1996-1999 period
Internal
validation
An internal
validation is carried out on the data received in order to
establish the quality of the information, to detect possible
errors in each of the variables and to check the coherence
between variables. This validation follows the criteria established
in the Instruction Manual for Reporting to the CMBDAH Register
and in accordance with the coding regulations of the ICD·9·CM.
During
the internal validation process, two new variables are created
on the basis of the original variables: the age of the patient
(based on date of birth and date of admission) and the length
of stay (based on date of admission and date of discharge).
It goes
on to show the validity of the variables corresponding to
conventional hospitalization and
CMA
in 1999. In general, the discharge, sociodemographic and
administrative identifying variables have a high level of
validity. The validity of the clinical variables has improved
considerably since 1995 (TABLE
3).
TABLE
3
Annual
growth in the quality of certain variables. 1996-1999 period
Variables
identifying the discharge
Validity greater than 99.7% for all variables.
Sociodemographic
variables
Date of birth, age and sex: validity greater than 99.9%.
Place of residence: validity of 97.1%.
Administrative
variables
Validity greater than 99.5% for all variables, except
for the transfer hospital variable (notification is only required
when the discharge status is a transfer to another acute-care
hospital, to a social health-care center or to a psychiatric
hospital), which has a validity of 84.3%.
Clinical
variables
Main diagnosis: validity of 99.1%.
Average
number of diagnoses (main and others) per discharge: 2.4.
First procedure: recorded in 75.1% of the discharges.
Where this variable is recorded, validity is 99.7%.
Average
number of procedures (all procedures) per discharge: 1.3.
External causes: validity of 82.8% for traumatology-related
admissions.
Perinatal
variables
Validity greater than 95% for all variables.

DESCRIPTIVE
ANALYSIS OF
THE CMBDAH REGISTER
The CMBDAH Register
compiles the data recorded by each hospital relating to conventional
hospitalization, major ambulatory surgery (CMA), day hospital (HdD)
and treatment of psychiatric sub-acute patients.
This report summarizes
the descriptive analysis of the 1999 CMBDAH Register and compares
it with that of 1996, 1997 and 1998, with the aim of assessing the
evolution of certain indicators.
The
information is presented in the following three blocks:
Conventional hospitalization together with CMA
Day hospital
Psychiatric sub-acute care
Data for conventional
hospitalization are analyzed together with those of CMA because major
surgical procedures, which tend to be dealt with on an ambulatory
basis, may at times require hospital admission. This depends on the
characteristics of the patient (co-morbidity, sociodemographic conditions)
or organizational decisions taken within the center (linked to the
dispersion of the reference population). Given that one of the objectives
of the CMBDAH is to analyze hospital morbidity, a joint analysis must
be made.
The data corresponding
to day hospitals and specialized psychiatric hospitals are analyzed
separately, since they involve types of activity which differ significantly
with respect both to each another and to the block of conventional
hospitalization
and CMA.
The definitions
of the three basic concepts used in this report are as follows:
Discharge:
the situation of the patient upon conclusion of the period of hospitalization.
Sick person: a person first admitted and subsequently discharged
from hospital.
Patient: a sick person who undergoes one or more discharges from
the same hospital during a one-year period.
These concepts
will also be used when we refer to the day hospital (HdD), although
instead of speaking of discharges we will use the term episodes,
since this type of activity does not involve any period of hospitalization.
In the tables
presenting the variables of age, sex or length of stay, where one
or more of these is non-valid, discharges are considered to be null
and void.
The remainder
of the variables considered non-valid has been grouped under the
category "unknown".
In the tables,
percentages lower than 0.05% are given as "0.0". A complete absence
of recorded cases is given as "-".
When
comparing information from different years, it is important to take
into account any changes that may have been brought about by the modification
of the Instruction Manual for Reporting to the CMBDAH Register, as
well as changes in the coverage and validity of the data. The CMBDAH
began compiling information on HdD and CMA in the second part of 1996,
and for this reason the information on these two types of hospital
activity has been progressively included.
Conventional
hospitalization and major ambulatory surgery (CMA)
Discharges and
patients
The number
of patients is calculated on the basis of the hospital code and
the medical record number. The medical record number makes it possible
to identify those patients who have been treated more than once
in the same hospital. However, it should be noted that the data
compiled in the Register do not reveal whether a patient has been
treated in different hospitals. This explains why the number of
patients may be slightly overestimated and, consequently, the average
number of discharges per patient underestimated.
The total number
of discharges reported to the CMBDAH Register in 1999 was 747,482.
These discharges corresponded to 608,560 patients. The average number
of discharges per patient was 1.23. The average number of discharges
for patients admitted more than once was 2.48. These patients (15.5%
of the total) accounted for 31.2% of the total number of discharges.
The average
number of discharges per patient shows differences according to
sex (1.26 in men and 1.20 in women) and age group (FIGURE
1).
FIGURE
1
Average
discharges per patient by sex and age group. Year 1999
The number
of patients and the average number of discharges per year are shown
in TABLE
4.
As can be seen, the number of patients has grown, especially as
regards patients with multiple discharges,
who
rose from 14.0% to 15.5% between 1996 and 1999. This growth is basically
linked to the aging of the population, which means that more and
more elderly patients are being admitted and with greater co-morbidity.
TABLE
4
Number
of patients and average discharges per patient, by year. 1996-1999
period

Age
and sex
Age is calculated
from two original variables: date of birth and date of admission.
Because of the non-validity of one of the two original variables,
the age variable was non-valid for 0.04% of the discharges.
The sex variable
was non-valid for 0.02% of the discharges.
Of all discharges,
362,220 (48.5%) were men and 384,649 (51.5%) were women. During
the 1996-1999 period, these proportions were similar. Nonetheless,
there has been a slight increase in the proportion of women (51.0%
in 1996).
The average
age was 51.3 years (51.7 years for men and 51.0 years for women).
TABLE
5
shows that, during the study period, the women were always younger
than the men were and the average age went up each year for both
sexes.
TABLE
5
Average
age by sex and year. 1996-1999 period.
The distribution
of discharges by age group and sex revealed widely varying results
(TABLE
6).
TABLE
6
Distribution
of discharges by sex, age group and place of residence, and hospitalization
rate for residents of Catalonia. Year 1999
Note:
Hospitalization
rate: number of discharges per 1,000 inhabitants
The discharges
of women ranging in age from 25 to 34 accounted for 17.0% of
the female discharges and 8.8% of all discharges.
Patients
of both sexes over 64 years of age made up 38.5% of all discharges
(34.8% in 1996) and those under 5 years of age, 6.7% (7.2% in
1996). The age group with the highest male proportion was that
of 1 to 14 years.
FIGURE
2
shows the percentage distribution by age and sex for the discharges
of Catalan residents recorded in the 1999 CMBDAH Register, and
the Catalan population according to the 1996 census. The hospitalization
rate has been calculated using these data (TABLE
6).
FIGURE
2
Distribution
of discharges of residents of Catalonia and of the population
of Catalonia, by sex and age group. Year 1999
This
rate was 116.5 per 1,000 inhabitants (102.4 in 1996). By age group,
the highest hospitalization rate was that of infants under one
year of age (473.4) followed by senior citizens over 84 years
of age (406.0). In the case of infants under one, 59.3% of discharges
involved infants admitted to hospital during their first week
of life (52.4% in 1996). The lowest hospitalization rate of the
group was that of children ranging in age from 10 to 14 (34.1),
especially girls.
Place
of residence
The
place of residence variable includes the codes for the province,
town, district (in the case of residents of the city of
Barcelona) and country (in the case of foreigners).
The degree
of non-validity for this variable (14.2%) was considerably
lower than in 1996 (1 7.2%).
Errors
were attributable to the information relating to the municipal
district of patients residing in the city of Barcelona.
If this
factor is discounted, the residence code makes it possible
to determine the town of 97.1% of discharges (95.9% in 1996).
The information
provided by this variable makes it possible to establish the
territorial distribution of discharges by health-care region
and by health-care sector of residence.
On the
basis of the province code, it is possible to assign certain
discharges to the relevant health-care region, even when the
town information was not valid. This has meant the assignation
of the region of residence for 0.2% of discharges that had
not made clear their town of residence. This assignation has
been made for patients residing in the health-care regions
of Lleida and Girona.
On the
basis of the town code, the health-care sector of residence
has been assigned to each discharge.
As for
discharges of residents of the city of Barcelona, where the
assignation requires knowledge of the municipal district,
and in view of the fact that this information has yet to be
exhaustively compiled, assignation of the health-care sector
was not possible for all Barcelona residents. For this reason,
all sectors of Barcelona have been treated together.
TABLE
7
shows the number of discharges per health-care region of residence
and the distribution according to the health-care region of
the discharging hospital.
TABLE
7
Percentage
distribution and number of discharges of residents in each
health-care region in relation to the health-care region of
the hospital. Year 1999
Of
the total of 747,482 discharges, it was possible to assign
the health-care region of residence to 710,129 (95.0%).
As for the remainder of discharges, 16,077 (2.2%) resided
outside Catalonia, while the place of residence was unknown
for 21,276 discharges (2.8%).
Of
the 710,129 discharges involving residents of Catalonia,
597,160 (84.1%) were treated in hospitals in their own health-care
region of residence (84.0% in 1996) while 112,969 (15.9%)
were treated in other regions. Of these discharges, 65,106
(9.2%) were residents of the health-care regions of Barcelona
Ciutat, Costa de Ponent and Barcelona Nord i Maresme and
were treated in one of these neighboring regions (9.3% in
1996). The remaining 47,863 discharges (6.7%) corresponded
to movement between other health-care regions.
As
regards discharges for whom residence is recorded as being
outside Catalonia (TABLE
7),
47.7% were from hospitals of the Barcelona Ciutat health-care
region and 17.4% from hospitals of the Lleida health-care
region, most of whom (2,229 discharges) were residents of
the province of Huesca. In absolute terms, the hospitals
of the health-care region of Barcelona Ciutat produced the
highest number of discharges of people standardized hospitalization
rates have also been calculated, according to the direct
method, using the population of Catalonia as the standard
(TABLE
8).
With respect both to health-care region and sector, differences
have been seen in the four indicators calculated. Some of
the lowest rates have been found in sectors where the population
is most elderly and vice versa (TABLE
8).
TABLE
9
synthesizes the variation of these indicators for the years
1996 and 1999, on the basis of the maximum/minimum rates
and of the variation coefficient weighted by population.
The variation among regions was lower since at this level
certain extreme cases in the sectors were compensated.
TABLE
9
Territorial
variation of the hospitalization indicators of discharges
financed by the SCS. Years 1996 and 1999
Contrary
to what one would expect, the variation in standardized
rates was greater than in gross rates.
FIGURE
3
shows the standardized hospitalization rates of the discharges
financed by the SCS, by health-care sector of residence.
For the purpose of comparison, it also shows the rate
for the whole of Catalonia and the variation coefficient
weighted by population. Of the entire group of sectors,
25 were found within the limits defined by the variation
coefficient, 9 plus Barcelona City which was treated
as a single sector were below it and the remaining
11 sectors were above it.
FIGURE
3
Standardized
hospitalization rate and variation coefficient by health-care
sector of residence, of discharges financed by the SCS.
Year 1999
To
evaluate the differences in hospitalization rates by
health-care sector of the discharges financed by the
SCS, one should bear in mind that publicly financed
hospital health care in a territory is conditioned by
the offer of other types of complementary health care
coverage.
More
frequent in urban areas with high socioeconomic levels,
the offer of private health care coverage in free-choice
insurance companies can be accompanied by relatively
low public hospitalization rates.
In
certain rural areas, where low population density and
good communication cannot justify the presence of a
hospital, primary attention takes on a substitute role
in certain lines of attention. In this case, the hospitalization
rates can be low.
From
the viewpoint of health-care policy, the presence of
a hospital is justified in areas of low density of population
where communication is difficult, for example, in a
mountainous region. In such cases, hospitalization rates
are higher than average because the offer of attention
provided by the close proximity of a hospital, no matter
how small it may be, increases the demand.
The
current situation caused by an aging population, in
which the proportion of elderly, multiple-pathology
patients is on the rise, causes the frequency of admission
of these patients to depend to a large extent on the
social health-care resources available in the area.
On
the other hand, the population variations seen following
the 1996 census may have caused health-care sectors with
greatest growth to have overestimated rates, while those
that have lost most population may be
underrated. Data provided by the census review of January
1, 1998, published by the Spanish National Statistics
Institute (INE), have revealed that the sectors of Garraf,
Baix Penedès, Cerdanya, Val d'Aran and Baix Llobregat
Centre i Nord have risen in population by 4%. However,
the sectors of Pallars Jussà, l'Hospitalet, Terra
Alta, Alta Ribagorça and Barcelonès Nord
show a population loss of over 1% with respect to the
census data of 1996.
Source of
payment
The
source of payment variable records the entity or
institution that paid for the sick person's hospitalization.
Of all discharges, 0.05% were non-valid in terms
of this variable.
84.7%
of all discharges recorded in the Register were financed
by the SCS, a proportion which rose to 94.4% if only
the discharges from XHUP hospitals are analyzed. The
number of discharges financed by the SCS in hospitals
not belonging to the XHUP and which report to the
CMBDAH Register was 7,434, a figure notably higher
than the 1,241 reported in 1996. This increase was
due to the activity of hospitals that in recent years
have ceased to belong to the XHUP.
FIGURE
4
shows the distribution of discharges not financed by
the SCS according to the financing system.
FIGURE
4
Distribution
of discharges not financed by the SCS, by source of
payment. Year 1999.
Of
the 15,178 discharges paid for by private financing
(2.0% of all discharges and 13.3% of the
discharges
not financed by the SCS), 3,858 were produced in XHUP
hospitals and 11,320 in hospitals not belonging to
this network.
Admission
and discharge
status
The
admission status variable was non-valid for 0.1%
of discharges.
The
breakdown of total discharges by status reveals
that 48.4% were planned and 51.6% were emergencies.
This distribution was similar in 1996-1999. Despite
the large growth of programmed activity by CMA,
the number of emergency admissions also grew in
similar proportion.
With
regard to the discharge status variable, 0.4% of
the discharges were non-valid. 93.5% of discharged
patients went home (TABLE
10).
The 22,518 deaths constituted 40.1% of all deaths
in Catalonia during 1999. This proportion was higher
to that of 1996, which was 37.2%.
TABLE
10
Distribution
of discharges by discharge status. Year 1999
Length
of stay
Length
of stay is a variable calculated on the basis of
the date of admission and the date of discharge.
0.03% of all discharges were not valid for the calculation
of length of stay (this percentage includes stays
longer than 6 months).
Average
length of stay presents a very wide range of variation
in relation to other variables such as age, sex,
diagnosis or source of payment,
among others.
In
1999, the average length of stay for all discharges
was 6.3 days (FIGURE
5),
while in 1996 it was 7.4 days. This decrease can
be attributed to a large extent to improved hospital
efficiency, but the inclusion of CMA is also an
important contributing factor.
FIGURE
5
Distribution
of discharges by days of stay. Year 1999
In
1999, the discharges financed by the SCS were
preceded by an average stay of 6.5 days while
those that were non-financed lasted 5.1 days (7.7
days and 5.7 days in 1996, respectively). The
shorter average length of stay preceding discharges
not financed by the SCS is basically explained
by the lower degree of complexity of the patients
treated.
The
average length of stay for men was 6.7 days, while
for women it was 5.9 days. In general, there was
a clear tendency for the average length of stay
to increase with age, with the exception of infants
under 1 year of age and women between 20 and 29
years of age (TABLE
11 and FIGURE 6).
In almost all age groups, the average length of
stay for women was shorter than for men, especially
between the ages of 20 and 39, owing to the very
high number of deliveries by women in this age
group.
TABLE
11
Days
of stay and average length of stay by age group
and sex. Year 1999
FIGURE
6
Average
length of stay by age group and sex. Year 1999
A
high volume of hospitalization combined with
a lengthy average stay meant that certain age
groups represented very high percentages of
the total number of days spent in hospital.
This was the case of those over 64 years, who
accounted for 38.5% of the discharges (TABLE
6)
and accumulated 49.1% of all days spent in hospital
(TABLE
11).
In 1996, these figures were 34.8% of all discharges
and 45.7% of all the days spent in hospital.
It
is also important to take into consideration
the significance of lengthy stays, because,
although stays lasting longer than 30 days represented
only 2.2% of discharges, they constituted 16.9%
of the total number of days spent in hospital.
In 1996, these figures accounted for 2.8% of
all discharges and 18.2% of all days spent in
hospital. The decrease of lengthy stays seen
during the period of study would explain a quarter
of the 1.1-day length-of-stay difference between
1996 and 1999.
If
length of stay is analyzed according to admission
status, it can be seen that emergency admissions
involved an average stay of 8.0 days while planned
stays lasted 4.4 days (8.8 and 5.8 days in 1996).
The shortened average length of stay for planned
discharges was basically due to increased CMA
activity.
Diagnoses
The
CMBDAH records the main diagnosis of each discharge
and up to three further diagnoses, coded according
to the ICD·9·CM.
The
main diagnostic variable indicates the reason
why a sick person was admitted to hospital.
The
other diagnoses include all illnesses or complications
detected
in
the sick person which are not considered as
being the main diagnosis; either already present
at the time of admission or developed during
the stay in hospital.
The
percentage of non-valid discharges for the
diagnostic variable was 0.9% of all discharges.
Lack of specific information was the cause
of non-validity in 0.4% of discharges. The
term "non-specific diagnosis" involved those
cases, where, although correct, the information
failed to present the maximum detail possible.
In
0.4% of all discharges there was no recorded
information on the main diagnosis; the variable
was either left blank or entered as an unknown
diagnosis (code 799.9). The other causes of
non-validity were attributable to coding errors
not included in the ICD·9·CM and
inconsistencies in relation to age and/or
sex (0.1%).
Accordingly,
in 0.5% of all discharges, there was no recorded
information on the main diagnosis. In 1996
this percentage was 1.1%.
64.5%
of the discharges provided correct information
regarding the first secondary diagnosis, while
for the second the percentage was 43.2% and
for the third 29.6%. Non-validity of these
further diagnoses was due primarily to lack
of specificity, which for the three secondary
diagnoses was 0.1%. Non-validity as a result
of error or inconsistency was 0.04%.
The
average number of recorded diagnoses per discharge
(main and other) was 2.37. In 1996 it was
2.12.
The
main diagnosis has been analyzed according
to two levels of classification:
Major ICD·9·CM diagnostic categories.
Diagnostic categories of the Clinical
Classifications for Health Care Policy Research
(CCHPR) proposed by the Agency for Health
Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) of the Department
of Health and Human Services of the United
States.
Major
ICD·9·CM diagnostic categories
The
ICD·9·CM sets out more than 13,000
diagnostic codes in 17 categories, plus
V code, which covers factors influencing
health status and contacts with health services.
TABLE
12
shows the distribution of discharges by
main diagnosis, in terms of these 18 categories.
TABLE
12
Distribution
of discharges, average length of stay and
average age by main diagnosis, according to
the main diagnostic categories of the ICD·9·MC.
Years 1996 and 1999
Note: Main
diagnostic unknown: main diagnosis not reported,
erroneous or inconsistent with age and/or
sex
The
five major categories with the greatest
number of discharges were those having to
do with the circulatory, digestive and respiratory
systems, diseases of the nervous system
and sense organs and neoplasms. These categories
altogether constituted 52.0% of all discharges.
During
the 1996-1999 period, diseases of the circulatory,
respiratory and digestive systems were the
most frequent. Diseases of the nervous system
and sense
organs
showed highest growth (a rise of 32.6%)
on account of increased CMA activity.
Although
each group comprises very different diagnoses
and patient typologies, it should be mentioned
that the longest average stays were those
involving mental disorders, neoplasms and
conditions originating in the perinatal
period. The shortest stays were for diseases
of the nervous system and sense organs and
complications of pregnancy, delivery and
the puerperium (TABLE
12).
The
diagnostic groups accumulating most days
in hospital were diseases of the circulatory
system, neoplasms, diseases of the respiratory
system and injuries and poisoning, which
constituted 51.5% of all stays.
Significant
differences were seen with regard to the
average age.
The
highest percentages involved diseases of
the circulatory system, of nervous system
and sense organs and neoplasms. The lowest
corresponded, predictably, to perinatal
and congenital diseases, followed by deliveries
and infectious diseases (TABLE
12).
There
were also differences in the distribution
of discharges by cause of admission in relation
to the age and sex of the patient (TABLES
13 and 14).
TABLE
13
Percentage
of discharges of the three main diagnostic
categories accumulating most discharges in
each age group, in men. Year 1999
TABLE
14
Percentage
of discharges of the three main diagnostic
categories accumulating most discharges in
each age group, in women. Year 1999
Perinatal
conditions and respiratory diseases were
significant for members of both sexes
under the age of 5. Circulatory problems
were most frequent in women over 64 and
men between 55 and 84. Differences by
sex were most evident in the intermediate
ages: in women, deliveries (15 to 44 years),
neoplasms (45 to 54 years) and diseases
of the musculoeskeletal system and connective
tissue (55 to 64 years); and in men, injuries
(5 to 34 years). Problems related to the
digestive system were significant for
both men and women of practically all
age groups, but fundamentally for men
between 35 and 54 years of age.
Diagnostic
categories of
the CCHPR
The
Clinical Classifications for Health Care
Policy Research (CCHPR) organize all the
diagnostic codes into 259 diagnostic categories,
using first and foremost a clinical criterion.
These 259 categories are then broken down
into 17 groups.
ANNEX
2
sets
out the detailed codes that make up each
of the diagnostic categories.
TABLE
15
shows the total number of discharges and
the percentage distribution, average length
of stay, average age, proportion of discharges
among women and mortality rate for 1999,
as well as the number of discharges and
percentage distribution for 1996 for comparative
purposes.
It
should be pointed out that the categories
showing greatest growth during the 1996-1999
period were cataracts, chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease, varicose veins of lower
extremities and congestive heart
failure, non-hypertensive. Categories
showing a proportionate drop included
normal pregnancy and /or delivery, maintenance
chemotherapy and radiotherapy, acute and
chronic tonsillitis and hyperplasia of
prostate.
The
following are the most noteworthy characteristics
of TABLE
15
for the most relevant categories, compared
with those of 1996,1997 and 1998.
TABLE
15
Diagnostic
categories according to the classification
of the CCHPR. 1996 and Year 1999
Notes: Not
assigned: codes that may apply to more
than one category. Main diagnosis unknown:
main diagnosis not recorded, erroneous
or inconsistent with age and/or sex.
Procedures
The
CMBDAH Register presents up to 4 diagnostic
or therapeutic procedures, coded in
accordance with the ICD·9·CM.
The
first is the diagnostic or therapeutic
procedure, which is carried out during
admission of the patient and most directly
related to the main diagnosis.
This
variable was recorded in 75.0% of all
discharges, of which 0.2% were not specified
and 0.03% either erroneous or inconsistent
with age and/or sex.
As
for other procedures, the percentages
of notification were 35.0% for the second,
12.8% for the third and 6.3% for the
fourth. The average number of procedures
recorded per discharge was 1.29 (1.16
in 1996).
As
with the main diagnosis, each category
level is presented in terms of two procedural
types:
Major ICD·9·CM procedural
groups.
Procedural categories of the Clinical
Classifications for Health Care Policy
Research (CCHPR) proposed by the Agency
for Health Care Policy and Research
(AHCPR) of the Department of Health
and Human Services of the United States.
Major
ICD·9·CM procedural categories
The
ICD·9·CM breaks down the
more than 4,000 procedural codes into
16 major categories.
TABLE
16
shows the distribution of discharges
by first procedure in terms of these
major categories. TABLE
16
Distribution
of discharges, average length of stay
and average age of first procedure,
according to the main procedural categories
of the ICD·9·MC. 1996-1999
period
Operations
on the digestive system, operations
on the musculoskeletal system, obstetrical
procedures and operations on the eye
accounted for 44.4% of the discharges
for which the first procedure was
recorded. During the 1996-1999 period,
these procedural categories were always
the most frequent, if one discounts
the category of miscellaneous procedures,
which rose from 15.3% in 1996 to 22.6%
in 1999. In evaluating this growth,
it should be kept in mind that the
miscellaneous procedural category
was made up almost entirely of non-surgical
procedures.
Although
each category comprises very different
procedures and patient typologies,
the longest average stays were the
|